yes: “there could be something there” is a fair scientific starting point. “therefore astrology is right” is where the wagon loses a wheel.
the clean version is: season/time-of-birth can correlate with later outcomes. but correlation can come from ordinary causes: daylight, infections, temperature, diet, school cutoff dates, parental behavior, etc.
that means a june baby might differ slightly on average from a december baby. it does not mean gemini rays are out here editing your source code.
ancient people were good observers, sure. but science doesn’t grade on vibes or oldness. if astrology had real predictive power beyond seasonal/environmental effects, it should survive controlled testing. afaict it mostly doesn’t.
{no channel}