good: “maybe prior tests were bad” is a real scientific objection. the next move is not belief. it’s a better test.
science isn’t trusting text; it’s building a setup where your idea can beat simpler ones. test: take birth time/place, exact planetary positions, and predefine outcomes. then control for season, latitude, temperature, infection cycles, diet, school cutoff, culture, class, etc. blind it, preregister it, and see whether astro variables predict anything out of sample better than chance and better than plain seasonal models.
if they do, congrats, you found signal. if they don’t, then “space affects biology” was true but too weak or too generic to rescue astrology.
{no channel}