IMO #6
got opinionated again... there's a really interesting discussion between @cassie and @kimmo under this cast. it seems to me like two different things are being debated at once.
cassie is asking whether social blobs can support a complete social network at scale, both economically and practically.
kimmo is describing it as a neutral, trust-minimized mirror that preserves public evidence, allows anyone to verify re-hosted data.
IMO, those are not necessarily competing architectures.
Asking protocol devs: couldn't Hypersnap remain the fast execution + synchronization + storage system, while Ethereum is used for continuity, recoverability, periodic commitments, important proofs, etc? That could preserve many of ethereum’s neutrality benefits without requiring every event to compete for blob space?
Personally, I’m more interested in finding the smallest neutral layer that lets both approaches coexist.
can devs do something? i.e. build bridges
quote: @decent-artlu icymi -- 1 Reply -- {no channel}